Economic diversification and economic development in Algeria using the Leontief inverse
Keywords:
Input–output analysis, Forward and backward linkages, development economics
Abstract
The goal of this study is to examine input-output (IO) tables of the construction sector and its relationships with other sectors of the Algerian productive structure and shows the forward and backward linkages that the construction sector had the potential to trigger off production in many economic sectors linked to it. Our results captured that light industry followed by hotels and services to households sectors are the most efficient activities and play a strong role in Algeria’s development economics, contrary agriculture and manufacturing sectors in our input-output analysis.
References
1. سي محمد كمال التنويع الاقتصادي وبدائل النمو في الجزائر ملتقى الوادي حول التنويع الاقتصادي، نوفمبر 2016
2. سي محمد كمال " قضايا في الاقتصاد الجزائري خلال نصف قرن" دار حامد للنشر والتوزيع، 2016
3. سوسان، خالد ممدوح، القيمة المضافة والمضاعف قطاع السياحة في الاردن، رسالة ماجيتير ، اليرموك، 1996
4. الحمادي، علي، دراسة تحليلية لروابط الجذب الامامية والخلفية في الاقتصاد العراقي، مجلة ابحاث اليرموك، عدد3 مجلد 10، .1994
5. مطلق، ايسراح، تحليل جدول المدخلات-المخرجات لقطاعات الاقتصاد الاردني المجممعة لعام 2006، مجلة المعاملات الاسلاميةوابحاث المالية الاسلامية، عدد 09، 2012.
6. Bon, R. (1988) Direct and indirect resource utilization by the construction sector: the case of the USA since World War II. Habitat International, 12(1), 49–74.
7. Bon, R. (1992) The future of international construction.Habitat International, 16(3), 119–28.
8. Bon, R. and Pietroforte, R. (1993) New construction versus maintenance and repair construction technology in the US since World War II. Construction Management and Economics, 11, 151–62.
9. Drejer, I. (2002) Input-Output based measures of interindustry linkages revisited – a survey and discussion. The 14th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Universite´ du Que´bec a´ Montre´al, Canada, 10–15 October, available at http://www.iioa.at/pdf/
10. Bon, R. and Pietroforte, R. (1990) Historical comparison of construction sectors in the United States, Japan, Italy and Finland using input–output tables. Construction Management and Economics, 8(3), 233–47.
11. Hirschman, A.O. (1958) Interdependence and Industrialization, in the Strategy of Economic Development, Yale University Press, New Haven.
12. Miller, R.E. and Blair, P.B. (1985) Input–Output Analysis: Foundation and Extensions, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13. Nakornthab, D., Piamcho, S. and Kanchanasai, C. (2004) Bank lending, the housing market and risks: a test for financial fragility Bank of Thailand. Discussion Paper, available at www.bot.or.th/BOTHomepage/DataBank/
14. Pietroforte, R. (1995) An input–output analysis of the Italian
construction sector, 1959–1958. Construction Management nd Economics, 13, 253–62.
15. Pietroforte, R. and Bon, R. (2000) Regional development and construction in Italy: an input–output analysis, 1959–1992. Construction Management and Economics, 18, 151–9.
16. Pietroforte, R. and Gregori, T. (2003) An input–output analysis of the construction sector in highly developed economies. Construction Management and Economics, 21, 319–27.
World Bank (1984) The Construction Industry: Issues and Strategies in Developing Countries, World Bank, Washington
2. سي محمد كمال " قضايا في الاقتصاد الجزائري خلال نصف قرن" دار حامد للنشر والتوزيع، 2016
3. سوسان، خالد ممدوح، القيمة المضافة والمضاعف قطاع السياحة في الاردن، رسالة ماجيتير ، اليرموك، 1996
4. الحمادي، علي، دراسة تحليلية لروابط الجذب الامامية والخلفية في الاقتصاد العراقي، مجلة ابحاث اليرموك، عدد3 مجلد 10، .1994
5. مطلق، ايسراح، تحليل جدول المدخلات-المخرجات لقطاعات الاقتصاد الاردني المجممعة لعام 2006، مجلة المعاملات الاسلاميةوابحاث المالية الاسلامية، عدد 09، 2012.
6. Bon, R. (1988) Direct and indirect resource utilization by the construction sector: the case of the USA since World War II. Habitat International, 12(1), 49–74.
7. Bon, R. (1992) The future of international construction.Habitat International, 16(3), 119–28.
8. Bon, R. and Pietroforte, R. (1993) New construction versus maintenance and repair construction technology in the US since World War II. Construction Management and Economics, 11, 151–62.
9. Drejer, I. (2002) Input-Output based measures of interindustry linkages revisited – a survey and discussion. The 14th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Universite´ du Que´bec a´ Montre´al, Canada, 10–15 October, available at http://www.iioa.at/pdf/
10. Bon, R. and Pietroforte, R. (1990) Historical comparison of construction sectors in the United States, Japan, Italy and Finland using input–output tables. Construction Management and Economics, 8(3), 233–47.
11. Hirschman, A.O. (1958) Interdependence and Industrialization, in the Strategy of Economic Development, Yale University Press, New Haven.
12. Miller, R.E. and Blair, P.B. (1985) Input–Output Analysis: Foundation and Extensions, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13. Nakornthab, D., Piamcho, S. and Kanchanasai, C. (2004) Bank lending, the housing market and risks: a test for financial fragility Bank of Thailand. Discussion Paper, available at www.bot.or.th/BOTHomepage/DataBank/
14. Pietroforte, R. (1995) An input–output analysis of the Italian
construction sector, 1959–1958. Construction Management nd Economics, 13, 253–62.
15. Pietroforte, R. and Bon, R. (2000) Regional development and construction in Italy: an input–output analysis, 1959–1992. Construction Management and Economics, 18, 151–9.
16. Pietroforte, R. and Gregori, T. (2003) An input–output analysis of the construction sector in highly developed economies. Construction Management and Economics, 21, 319–27.
World Bank (1984) The Construction Industry: Issues and Strategies in Developing Countries, World Bank, Washington
Published
2021-03-08
Section
Articles
