Numerical investigation to reduce environmental emissions from manufacturing industries
Abstract
This paper aims to study carbon dioxide emissions from the cement manufacturing under wind conditions. These effects are investigated by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code used both method such as a Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and K-ε methods to investigate a spread of pollution in vicinity of manufacturing. The predicted concentration, velocity and temperature of CO2 were used as the safety criterion to provide the useful information about a pollution amount resulted under variant environmental and structural conditions. A detailed look at results is beyond the scope of analysis to determine optimal CO2 emission. From the present numerical simulation the carbon dioxide appears to be the best candidate as tracer gas and Simulation (LES) methods, which directly calculate the large-scale turbulent structures and reserve modeling offer the best analysis of turbulent flows.
References
Berger, S., Sharp, P.A. and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Task Force on Innovation and Production (2013) A Preview of the MIT Production in the Innovation Economy Report. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at: http://web.mit.edu/pie/news/PIE_Preview.pdf.
Chen, C., Habert, G., Bouzidi, Y., & Jullien, A. (2010). Environmental impact of cement production: detail of the different processes and cement plant variability evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(5), 478-485.
Gäbel, K. (2001). A life cycle process model. Simulation of Environmental, Product and Economic Performance in Cement Production.
Gäbel, K., Forsberg, P., & Tillman, A. M. (2004). The design and building of a lifecycle-based process model for simulating environmental performance, product performance and cost in cement manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(1), 77-93.
Helper, S., Krueger, T., & Wial, H. (2012). Locating American Manufacturing. Trends in the Geography of production. Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings.
Huntzinger, D. N., & Eatmon, T. D. (2009). A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(7), 668-675.
Josa, A., Aguado, A., Cardim, A., & Byars, E. (2007). Comparative analysis of the life cycle impact assessment of available cement inventories in the EU. Cement and concrete research, 37(5), 781-788.
Leigh, N. G., & Hoelzel, N. Z. (2012). Smart growth's blind side: Sustainable cities need productive urban industrial land. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(1), 87-103.
Malhotra, V. M. (1999). Making concrete" greener" with fly ash. Concrete international, 21(5), 61-66.
Nauclér, T., & Enkvist, P. A. (2009). Pathways to a low-carbon economy: Version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. McKinsey & Company, 192(3).
Reijnders, L. (2007). The cement industry as a scavenger in industrial ecology and the management of hazardous substances. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(3), 15-25.
Summerbell, D. L., Barlow, C. Y., & Cullen, J. M. (2016). Potential reduction of carbon emissions by performance improvement: A cement industry case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1327-1339.
Toja-Silva, F., Pregel-Hoderlein, C., & Chen, J. (2018). On the urban geometry generalization for CFD simulation of gas dispersion from chimneys: Comparison with Gaussian plume model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 177, 1-18.
Van Oss, H. G., & Padovani, A. C. (2003). Cement manufacture and the environment part II: environmental challenges and opportunities. Journal of Industrial ecology, 7(1), 93-126.
Wang, Z. F., Xia, B., Xue, T., Liu, L. S., Wu, J. X., Wang, E. Y., & Gou, X. (2014). Simulation Research about Impacts of Flue Gas on Surrounding Buildings. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 694, 514–519. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.694.514
Zhiyin, Y. (2015). Large-eddy simulation: Past, present and the future. Chinese journal of Aeronautics, 28(1), 11-24.
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Building Materials and Structures
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
