Comparative performance of isolated and fixed-base reinforced concrete structures

  • Naima Adjou University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene (USTHB), Algiers.
  • Naima Haddadou National Center of Studies and Integrated Research on Building Engineering (CNERIB), Cité Nouvelle El-Mokrani, Souidania, Algiers.
Keywords: Damping, energy dissipation, lead rubber bearing, nonlinear static method, seismic isolation

Abstract

The earthquake transmits to the structure a large quantity of energy that causes damage to structures. The seismic isolation technique can absorb a large quantity of the seismic energy. The seismic isolation concept is a new technique in earthquake engineering, its principle is quite simple, and it consists to create a discontinuity between the foundation and the superstructure, so that seismic energy cannot be completely transmitted into the structure.
Therefore, this article includes a numerical application of the nonlinear static method, the capacity spectrum method (CSM), on two types of structures, fixed base structure and isolated base structure. The CSM is one of the methods used for the evaluation of seismic performance. Its principle consists in superimposing a curve which represents the capacity of the structure originated from a non-linear static analysis (Pushover), with a curve representing the solicitation brought by the earthquake. The intersection of these two curves represents the point performance, which evaluates the maximum displacement of the structure in the plastic domain.

References

Applied Technology Council, ATC (1996). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. ATC-40, Volumes 1 and 2, Report No. SSC 96-01, Seismic Safety Commission, Redwood City, CA.

Chopra AK, Goel RK (1999). Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley, Report No. PEER 1999/02.

Freeman SA (2004). Review of the development of the capacity spectrum method. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 41(1), 1-13.

Koh CG, Kelly JM (1985). Fractional Derivative Representation of Seismic Response of Base-Isolated Models: Theory and Experiments. UCB/SESM 85/07, University of California at Berkeley.

Krawinkler H (1996). Pushover analysis: why, how, when, and when not to use it. In Proceedings of the 65th Annual Convention of the Structural Engineers Association of California.

Nazé PA (2004). Contribution to the prediction of structural damage in reinforced concrete under seismic loading. Doctoral dissertation, INSA Lyon, France. (In French)

Saez E (2006). Design of buildings based on the notion of performance. Doctoral dissertation, Ecole Centrale de Paris, France. (In French)

Yang YB, Chang KC, Yau JD (2003). Base Isolation. Earthquake Engineering Handbook, Chapter 17, CRC Press, Washington DC.

Published
2015-01-30
How to Cite
Adjou, N., & Haddadou, N. (2015). Comparative performance of isolated and fixed-base reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Building Materials and Structures, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.34118/jbms.v2i1.13
Section
Original Articles