Assessment of Non-destructive Methods for Evaluating the Performance of Surface Treatments on Concrete
Abstract
Hydrophobic films are frequently applied to concrete structures to reduce water ingress and provide protection against weathering and chemical attacks. However, these waterproof coatings tend to deteriorate with time and require reapplication to maintain their effectiveness. Deciding when the retreatment should be applied and how to assess existing treated surfaces can sometimes be a challenging task for owners of concrete structures. Consequently, this paper presents findings on the assessment of absorption characteristics of surface-treated concrete using several techniques. Three non-destructive test methods were used to evaluate the efficacy of surface treatment under different curing conditions and with varying numbers of treatments. The methods employed were the initial surface absorption test, Karsten tube test and electrical conductivity test (wet method). The results show that the employed methods were all able to distinguish between treated and untreated surfaces. Treated samples exhibited better resistance to water absorption and electrical conductivity than untreated ones, and the absorption characteristics were found to be influenced by the number of treatments and curing regimes. All three test methods were effective in assessing surface treatment quality, with the Karsten tube test being the most practical for in-situ evaluation due to the simplicity of its setup.
References
Ajayi, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., Alaka, H. A., Owolabi, H. A., & Kadiri, K. O. (2015). Waste effectiveness of the construction industry: Understanding the impediments and requisites for improvements. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 102, 101–112.
Al-Jabari, M. (2022). Concrete durability problems: physicochemical and transport mechanisms. In M. Al-Jabari (Ed.), Integral Waterproofing of Concrete Structures (pp. 69–107). Woodhead Publishing.
Benson, T. B., McDonald, P. J., Mulheron, M., & Nwaubani, S. O. (1998). The use of magnetic resonance imaging techniques in assessing the uptake of surface treatments and water movement through stone faces. Materials and Structures, 31(6), 423–427.
Beushausen, H., Otieno, M., & Alexander, M. (2021). Durability of Concrete. In Fulton’s Concrete Technology. Cement & Concrete SA.
Boesch, M. E., & Hellweg, S. (2010). Identifying improvement potentials in cement production with life cycle assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(23), 9143–9149.
BS 1881. (1970). Methods of Testing Concrete – Part 5: Methods of testing hardened concrete for other than strength. London, United Kingdom.
Büttner, T., & Raupach, M. (2008). Durability of Hydrophobic Treatments on Concrete – Results from Laboratory Tests. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Water Repellent Treatment of Building Materials, 329–340.
Chen, H., Feng, P., Du, Y., Jiang, J., & Sun, W. (2018). The effect of superhydrophobic nano-silica particles on the transport and mechanical properties of hardened cement pastes. Construction and Building Materials, 182, 620–628.
Dumbelton, J. (1996). Determination of the Efficacy of Surface Treatments on Porous Building Materials [A Thesis]. University of Surrey, United Kingdom.
Gardner, D., Lark, R., Jefferson, T., & Davies, R. (2018). A survey on problems encountered in current concrete construction and the potential benefits of self-healing cementitious materials. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 8, 238–247.
Georgiopoulou, M., & Lyberatos, G. (2018). Life cycle assessment of the use of alternative fuels in cement kilns: A case study. Journal of Environmental Management, 216, 224–234.
Gilayeneh, V. S., & Nwaubani, S. O. (2022). Transport Properties of Pozzolanic Concrete Based on the South African Durability Indexes. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering.
Hassan, K., & Cabrera, J. G. (1995). Short and long term performance of silane treated concrete. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Surface Treatment of Building Materials with Water-Repellent Agents, 9–10.
Ibrahim, M., Al-Gahtani, A. S., Maslehuddin, M., & Almusallam, A. A. (1997). Effectiveness of concrete surface treatment materials in reducing chloride-induced reinforcement corrosion. Construction and Building Materials, 11(7), 443–451.
Lucquiaud, V., Courard, L., Gérard, O., Michel, F., Handy, M., Aggoun, S., & Cousture, A. (2014). Evaluation of the Durability of Hydrophobic Treatments on Concrete Architectural Heritage. Restoration of Buildings and Monuments, 20(6), 395–404.
Medeiros, M., & Helene, P. (2008). Efficacy of surface hydrophobic agents in reducing water and chloride ion penetration in concrete. Materials and Structures, 41(1), 59–71.
Nwaubani, S. O. (1999). Non-destructive assessment of the performance of surface-treated concrete. Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings, 16(1).
Nwaubani, S. O. (2018). Non-destructive testing of concrete treated with penetrating surface sealant using a Karsten-tube. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting.
Nwaubani, S. O. (2019). Evaluation of electrical conductivity as a technique for assessing the efficacy of surface-treated concrete. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, 150–162.
Nwaubani, S. O., & Dumbelton, J. (1997). Influence of polymeric surface treatments on the permeability and microstructure of high strength concrete. Proceedings of the 3rd Southern African Conference on Polymers in Concrete and ICPIC Workshop, 388–402.
Nwaubani, S. O., & Dumbelton, J. (2001). A practical approach to in-situ evaluation of surface-treated structures. Construction and Building Materials, 15(4), 199–212.
Nwaubani, S. O., Mulheron, M., Tilly, G. P., & Schwamborn, B. (2000). Pore-structure and water transport properties of surface-treated building stones. Materials and Structures, 33(3), 198–206.
Pan, X., Shi, Z., Shi, C., Ling, T.-C., & Li, N. (2017). A review on surface treatment for concrete – Part 2: Performance. Construction and Building Materials, 133, 81–90.
RILEM TC 25-PEM. (1980). Recommended tests to measure the deterioration of stone and to assess the effectiveness of treatment methods. Materials and Structures, 13(75), 175–253.
Spence, R., & Mulligan, H. (1995). Sustainable development and the construction industry. Habitat International, 19(3), 279–292.
Teo, M. M. M., & Loosemore, M. (2001). A theory of waste behaviour in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 19(7), 741–751.
Tilly, G. P., Nwaubani, S. O., Sasse, H. R., & Bordado, J. (1996). Re-treatment and assessment of consolidated stone faces. EC Contract EV5V-CT94-0518, Final Report, 2.
Van Hees, R. P. J., van der Klugt, L. J. A. R., De Witte, E., De Clercq, H., Binda, L., & Baronio, G. (1995). Test methods for the evaluation of the in situ performance of water-repellent treatments. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Surface Treatment of Building Materials with Water-Repellent Agents.
Yu, Z., Ni, C., Tang, M., & Shen, X. (2018). Relationship between water permeability and pore structure of Portland cement paste blended with fly ash. Construction and Building Materials, 175, 458–466.
Zhang, P., Wittmann, F. H., Zhao, T., & Lehmann, E. H. (2010). Neutron imaging of water penetration into cracked steel reinforced concrete. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 405(7), 1866–1871.
Copyright (c) 2024 Sunday O. Nwaubani, Victor S. Gilayeneh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.