Partial substitution of coal with palm kernel in cement kilns: effects on cement production and quality

  • Kalamba Harlene Tshibola Department of Chemical Engineering, University of South Africa, Florida campus, South Africa
  • Bolanle Deborah Ikotun Department of Civil Engineering, University of South Africa, Florida campus, South Africa
  • Bilal Patel Department of Civil Engineering, University of South Africa, Florida campus, South Africa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34118/jbms.v10i2.3461
Keywords: Cement production, fossil fuel, alternative fuel, palm kernel, thermal substitution rate, Physico-chemical analysis

Abstract

The production of Portland cement is a complex process involving several chemical reactions and different materials, complex systems, and high temperatures (up to 1500 °C). Traditional fossil fuels such as coal, petroleum coke and natural gas have been used as primary source of energy for the process, though still abundant, their supply is slowly being depleted, and costs associated with obtaining these fuels are increasing with time. Therefore, alternative fuels such as biomass waste (palm kernel, rice, and coffee husks etc.) or processed waste materials (refuse derived fuel, waste tires, waste plastics, used oil etc.) and other types of waste have gained much interest recently in cement industries as they present a potential substitution option. In order to achieve the aim of this study, chemical and physical properties of both coal and PK have been determined and compared. Results show that the PK has an average calorific value ranging from 18-20 MJ/kg which is significantly acceptable and means that the waste can directly be used as fuel in the cement kiln for clinker production. Coal thermal substitution rate was progressively increased depending on the process conditions with the reference case for each kiln run (2% in August 2021, 3% in September 2021 and 5% in January 2022). Impacts on the product quality and process, benefits in terms of emissions and production cost were evaluated and discussed. Technical challenges encountered during the coal and palm kernel milling process and combustion process have been identified and possible solutions have been recommended.

References

Akkapeddi, S. (2008). Alternative solid fuels for the production of Portland cement, MSc. Thesis. Alabama: Auburn University.

DeBeer, J., Cihlar, J., & Hensing, I. (2017). Status and prospects of coprocessing. Ecofys, 3-88.

Hashem, F. S., Razek, T. A., & Mashout, H. A. (2019). Rubber and plastic wastes as alternative refused fuel in cement industry. Construction and Building Materials, 212, 275-282.

Madlool, N. A., Saidura, R., Hossain, M. S., & Rahim, N. A. (2011). A critical review on energy use and savings in the cement industries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(4), 2042-2060.

Nalobile, P., Wachira, J. M., Thiong’o, J. K., & Marangu, J. M. (2020). A Review on Pyro-processing techniques for selected wastes. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, 1-12.

PPC International. (2017). A Technical Review PPC-DRC, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Zimbabwe. Tony Hadley African advisory limited. Johannesburg: Hadley African, 1-89.

Sanjuan, M. A., Andrad, C., Mora, P., & Zaragoza, A. (2020). Carbon dioxide uptake by cement-based materials: A spanish case study. Applied Sciences, 10(1), 339.

Schaller, A., & Kaufmann, S. (2016). Sustainability Report. Heidelberg, Germany: Heidelberg Cement.

Sedaghat, A., Shanahan, N., & Zayed, A. (2015). Predicting one-day, Three-day, and Seven-day Heat of Hydration of Portland Cement. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27(9).

Shafiee, S., & Topal, E. (2010). A Long-term view of worldwide fossil fuel prices. Applied Energy, 87(3), 988-1000.

Thomas, J. J., & Jennings, H. M. (2006). A colloidal interpretation of chemical aging of the C-S-H gel and its effects on the properties of cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research, 36(1), 30-38.

Uson, A. A., Lopez-Sabiron, A. M., Ferreira, G., & Sastresa, E. L. (2013). Uses of alternative fuels and raw materials in the cement industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 23, 242-260.

Wilson, L., John, G. R., Mhilu, C. F., Yang, W., & Blasiak, W. (2010). Coffee husks gasification using high temperature air/steam agent. Fuel Processing Technology, 1330-1337.

Winter, N. B. (2009). Understanding cement: An introduction to cement production,cement hydration and detelerious processes in concrete. Suffolk: WHD Microanalysis Consultants Ltd.

Zieri, W., & Ismail, I. (2018). Alternative Fuels from waste products in cement Industry. Handbook of Eco materials.

Published
2023-12-31
How to Cite
Tshibola, K. H., Ikotun, B. D., & Patel , B. (2023). Partial substitution of coal with palm kernel in cement kilns: effects on cement production and quality. Journal of Building Materials and Structures, 10(2), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.34118/jbms.v10i2.3461
Issue
Vol 10 No 2 (2023)
Section
Original Articles

Copyright (c) 2024 Kalamba Harlene Tshibola, Bolanle Deborah Ikotun, Bilal Patel

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.