Comparative design procedures of stone columns for liquefaction stabilization

  • Tahar Messafer Research Unit: Materials, Processes and Environment, M’Hamed Bougara University of Boumerdes, Algeria
  • Mohamed Oussama Hassak Civil Engineering Department, M’Hamed Bougara University, Boumerdes, Algeria
  • Adem Abzar Civil Engineering Department, M’Hamed Bougara University, Boumerdes, Algeria,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34118/jbms.v7i1.74

Abstract

Soil liquefaction is one of the most important and complex phenomena of soil dynamics. It is a loss of résistance of loose granular soils under a seismic shock.

The aim of this work is to study the improvement made on a liquefiable soil using a stone column solution by several methods namely observational, static and dynamic solutions. The site used for this application is located in a terminal port container in Algiers. The analysis was carried out using the test results of standard penetration and cone penetrometer tests completed during a site investigation.

A comparative study between the methods was carried out to determine the most suitable method. The results of the 3 methods showed that the sizing by taking into account the earthquake, the mesh of stone columns is denser. It was deduced that it is important to analyze by the dynamic method in seismic zones and by static or observational techniques in areas of no or low risk of liquefaction. Recommendation for further research was put forward to develop new tools in order to improve current design methods.

References

Babu, M. D., Nayak, S., & Shivashankar, R. (2013). A critical review of construction, analysis and behaviour of stone columns. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 31(1), 1-22.

Balaam, N. P., & Booker, J. R. (1981). Analysis of rigid rafts supported by granular piles. International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics, 5(4), 379-403.

Blake, T. F. (1997). Summary Report of Proceedings of the NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. Youd TL, and Idriss IM. eds., Technical Report NCEER 97-0022.

CFMS, (2011). Recommandations sur la conception, le calcul, l’exécution et le contrôle des colonnes ballastées sous bâtiments et sous ouvrages sensibles au tassement, Comité Français de Mécanique des Sols.

Faccioli, E., & Resendiz, D. (1976). Soil dynamics behavior including liquefaction in seismic risk and engineering decisions, Lomnitz and Rosenblueth, Eds, Elsevier Scientiific publishing co. , New York, pp. 71-140, chap 4.

Han, J., & Ye, S. L. (2002). A theoretical solution for consolidation rates of stone column-reinforced foundations accounting for smear and well resistance effects. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2(2), 135-151.

Idriss, I. M., & Boulanger, R. W. (2006). Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 26(2-4), 115-130.

Kumari, S., Sawant, V. A., & Mehndiratta, S. (2018). Effectiveness of Stone Column in Liquefaction Mitigation. Proceedings of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V. 207-216.

Ordóñez, G. A. (2012). SHAKE2000: A Computer Program for the 1-D Analysis of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Problems. GeoMotions, LLC, Lacey, Washington, USA.

Robertson, P. K., & Campanella, R. G. (1985). Liquefaction potential of sands using the CPT. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 111(3), 384-403.

Robertson, P. K., & Wride, C. E. (1998). Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Canadian geotechnical journal, 35(3), 442-459.

RPA99 (2003), Règles Parasismiques Algériennes, Centre national de recherché appliqué en génie parasismique.

Samuel Thanaraj M., Freeda Christy C., Brema J. (2019). Analysis on the Performance of Stone Columns with Different Materials in Soil Stabilization, International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 8(3S), 148-153.

Sarker, D., & Abedin, M. Z. A Review on Ground Improvement Techniques to Improve Soil Stability against Liquefaction., International Journal of Science and Engineering Investigations, 4(40):53-55.

Seed, H. B. & Idriss, I. M. (1971). Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential, Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 107, No SM9, 1249-1274.

Seed, H. B., & Booker, J. R. (1977). Stabilization of potentially liquefiable sand deposits using gravel drains, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. GT7, 757-768.

Zukri, A., & Nazir, R. (2018). Sustainable materials used as stone column filler: A short review. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 342, No. 1, p. 012001. IOP Publishing.

Published
2020-04-01
How to Cite
Messafer, T., Hassak , M. O., & Abzar , A. (2020). Comparative design procedures of stone columns for liquefaction stabilization. Journal of Building Materials and Structures, 7(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.34118/jbms.v7i1.74
Issue
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2020)
Section
Original Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC