Financial Valuation of Artificial Intelligence Firms: A Panel Data Approach Based on the Modified Ohlson Model

  • Omar METIDJI University of Laghouat, Digitalization and Quantitative Applications in Economic Sciences Laboratory, Algeria
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Financial Valuation, Modified Ohlson Model, Panel Data, R&D Expenditures

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of market valuations for Artificial Intelligence (AI) firms to determine whether the recent surge in technology stock prices reflects a behavioral speculative bubble or rational pricing of financial fundamentals. Using a Modified Ohlson Model, the research analyzes a balanced panel data sample of 30 leading U.S. AI-centric technology firms from Q1 2020 to Q4 2025. Econometric estimation via a robust Fixed Effects model reveals a paradigm shift in value relevance. Traditional accounting metrics, such as tangible Book Value Per Share (BVPS), lost statistical significance, while current Earnings Per Share (EPS) exhibited a negative valuation impact. Conversely, Research and Development (R&D) expenditures demonstrated a significant positive premium, indicating that financial markets actively reward innovation intensity and penalize short-term profit maximization.

The findings conclude that the 'AI premium' is not merely speculative noise but a rational market response to aggressive technological reinvestment. Consequently, the study recommends recalibrating traditional valuation multiples and reforming accounting standards to better capture intangible assets.

References

AI versus the Dotcom Bubble: 8 reasons the AI wave is different. (n.d.). Global Corporate. Retrieved 22 May 2026, from https://www.janushenderson.com/corporate/article/ai-versus-the-dotcom-bubble-8-reasons-the-ai-wave-is-different/

Babina, T., Fedyk, A., He, A., & Hodson, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 151, 103745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.103745

Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5

Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2008). All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors. Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785–818. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm079

Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Model of Investor Sentiment (Working Paper No. 5926). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5926

Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., Kwon, S. Y., & Shleifer, A. (2021). Diagnostic bubbles. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(3), 1060–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.06.019

Chan, L. K. C., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures. Retrieved 22 May 2026, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0022-1082.00411

Da, Z., Engelberg, J., & Gao, P. (2011). In Search of Attention. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1461–1499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01679.x

De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., & Waldmann, R. J. (1987). The Economic Consequences of Noise Traders (Working Paper No. 2395). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w2395

Eisfeldt, A. L., Schubert, G., & Zhang, M. B. (2023). Generative AI and Firm Values (Working Paper No. 31222). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31222

Gujarati, D.N. and Porter, D.C. (2009) Basic Econometrics. 5th Edition, McGraw Hill Inc., New York. - References—Scientific Research Publishing. (n.d.). Retrieved 22 May 2026, from https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1568730

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7

Jeffrey M. Wooldridge. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press.

Korinek, A., & Suh, D. (2024). The simple macroeconomics of AI. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2024-04/The%20Simple%20Macroeconomics%20of%20AI.pdf

Lev, B., & Gu, F. (2016). The End of Accounting and the Path Forward for Investors and Managers (1st edn). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119270041

Lopez-Lira, A., & Tang, Y. (2023). Can ChatGPT Forecast Stock Price Movements? Return Predictability and Large Language Models (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4412788). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4412788

Malkiel, B. G. (2020). A RANDOM WALK DOWN WALL STREET: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing (12th edn). W. W. Norton & Company. https://yourknowledgedigest.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/a-random-walk-down-wall-street.pdf

Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x

Phillips, P. C. B., Shi, S., & Yu, J. (2015). Testing for Multiple Bubbles: Historical Episodes of Exuberance and Collapse in the S&p 500. International Economic Review, 56(4), 1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12132

Pietrzak, M. (2025). A trillion dollars race—How ChatGPT affects stock prices. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00470-5

Xiong, W., & Yu, J. (2011). The Chinese Warrants Bubble. American Economic Review, 101(6), 2723–2753. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2723

Published
2026-06-05
How to Cite
METIDJI, O. (2026). Financial Valuation of Artificial Intelligence Firms: A Panel Data Approach Based on the Modified Ohlson Model. Journal of Excellence for Economics and Management Research, 10(1), 371-388. Retrieved from https://journals.lagh-univ.dz/index.php/jeemr/article/view/4602
Section
Original Article