Financial Valuation of Artificial Intelligence Firms: A Panel Data Approach Based on the Modified Ohlson Model
Résumé
This study investigates the determinants of market valuations for Artificial Intelligence (AI) firms to determine whether the recent surge in technology stock prices reflects a behavioral speculative bubble or rational pricing of financial fundamentals. Using a Modified Ohlson Model, the research analyzes a balanced panel data sample of 30 leading U.S. AI-centric technology firms from Q1 2020 to Q4 2025. Econometric estimation via a robust Fixed Effects model reveals a paradigm shift in value relevance. Traditional accounting metrics, such as tangible Book Value Per Share (BVPS), lost statistical significance, while current Earnings Per Share (EPS) exhibited a negative valuation impact. Conversely, Research and Development (R&D) expenditures demonstrated a significant positive premium, indicating that financial markets actively reward innovation intensity and penalize short-term profit maximization.
The findings conclude that the 'AI premium' is not merely speculative noise but a rational market response to aggressive technological reinvestment. Consequently, the study recommends recalibrating traditional valuation multiples and reforming accounting standards to better capture intangible assets.
Références
AI versus the Dotcom Bubble: 8 reasons the AI wave is different. (n.d.). Global Corporate. Retrieved 22 May 2026, from https://www.janushenderson.com/corporate/article/ai-versus-the-dotcom-bubble-8-reasons-the-ai-wave-is-different/
Babina, T., Fedyk, A., He, A., & Hodson, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 151, 103745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.103745
Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2008). All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors. Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785–818. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm079
Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Model of Investor Sentiment (Working Paper No. 5926). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5926
Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., Kwon, S. Y., & Shleifer, A. (2021). Diagnostic bubbles. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(3), 1060–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.06.019
Chan, L. K. C., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures. Retrieved 22 May 2026, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0022-1082.00411
Da, Z., Engelberg, J., & Gao, P. (2011). In Search of Attention. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1461–1499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01679.x
De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., & Waldmann, R. J. (1987). The Economic Consequences of Noise Traders (Working Paper No. 2395). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w2395
Eisfeldt, A. L., Schubert, G., & Zhang, M. B. (2023). Generative AI and Firm Values (Working Paper No. 31222). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31222
Gujarati, D.N. and Porter, D.C. (2009) Basic Econometrics. 5th Edition, McGraw Hill Inc., New York. - References—Scientific Research Publishing. (n.d.). Retrieved 22 May 2026, from https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1568730
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
Jeffrey M. Wooldridge. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press.
Korinek, A., & Suh, D. (2024). The simple macroeconomics of AI. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2024-04/The%20Simple%20Macroeconomics%20of%20AI.pdf
Lev, B., & Gu, F. (2016). The End of Accounting and the Path Forward for Investors and Managers (1st edn). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119270041
Lopez-Lira, A., & Tang, Y. (2023). Can ChatGPT Forecast Stock Price Movements? Return Predictability and Large Language Models (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4412788). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4412788
Malkiel, B. G. (2020). A RANDOM WALK DOWN WALL STREET: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing (12th edn). W. W. Norton & Company. https://yourknowledgedigest.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/a-random-walk-down-wall-street.pdf
Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x
Phillips, P. C. B., Shi, S., & Yu, J. (2015). Testing for Multiple Bubbles: Historical Episodes of Exuberance and Collapse in the S&p 500. International Economic Review, 56(4), 1043–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12132
Pietrzak, M. (2025). A trillion dollars race—How ChatGPT affects stock prices. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00470-5
Xiong, W., & Yu, J. (2011). The Chinese Warrants Bubble. American Economic Review, 101(6), 2723–2753. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2723

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
