Speech acts and argumentative any relationship? A theoretical approach to the foundations of the relationship between illocutionary act and perlocutionary act.

Abstract

       This article aims to attempt to monitor the nature of the relationship between the two most important deliberative theories: They are the theory of speech acts and the theory of argumentation, by observing the manifestations of this relationship in the second and third branches of the speech act, which are the action included in the statement and the action resulting from the statement according to the pioneers of the theory of speech acts on the one hand, as it is the favorite theory in the contemporary pragmatic lesson, and among the pioneers of the theory of argumentation, especially in On the other hand, some theories were concerned with the relationship between them, trying to uncover the methodological frameworks and standards that led to separating or connecting the relationship and the extent of its relevance, such as “convention” and “intent” in the approach to speech acts, and “simplicity and  composition” in the argumentative approach.