Selection Tool for Concrete Mixes, a Sustainability-Based Approach
Abstract
Over the past decade, the global population has experienced significant growth, a trend that is anticipated to continue in the coming years. This increase has led to a surge in demand for concrete, driving greater reliance on Portland cement production. Manufacturing Portland cement is widely recognized as both energy-intensive and a major contributor to carbon dioxide emissions, which is the main global warming contributor. Addressing these challenges requires innovative approaches to improve concrete sustainability, while maintaining its functionality. This research aims to develop more sustainable concrete by integrating waste materials and adopting environmentally friendly binders. Various concrete mixes were designed and evaluated based on mechanical properties as well as environmental impact. Materials used include recycled glass waste, ethylene vinyl acetate, and geopolymer binders. These materials were selected for their potential to reduce reliance on traditional cement, minimizing energy consumption and carbon emissions. The study’s results highlight the feasibility of achieving significant reductions in environmental impact without compromising the mechanical performance of concrete. A sustainability ranking tool tailored to assess the sustainability of the mix based on its constituents, properties, and project-specific factors such as location is introduced. This tool provides a framework for promoting sustainable decision-making in construction. The tool was used to rank the mixes developed in this study based on different countries. Ultimately, this study seeks to advance the adoption of eco-conscious practices within the construction industry.
References
Adawy, M., & Wang, Y. (2015). Recycled glass as a partial replacement for fine aggregate in structural concrete – Effects on compressive strength. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 14(1), 116–122.
Almutairi, A. L., Tayeh, B. A., Adesina, A., Isleem, H. F., & Zeyad, A. M. (2021). Potential applications of geopolymer concrete in construction: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00733.
Bellum, R. R., Al Khazaleh, M., Pilla, R. K., Choudhary, S., & Venkatesh, C. (2022). Effect of slag on strength, durability and microstructural characteristics of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, 7(1), Article 25.
CEMBUREAU. (2021). Cementing the European Green Deal: Achieving climate neutrality by 2050.
Divsholi, B. S., Lim, T. Y. D., & Teng, S. (2014). Durability properties and microstructure of ground granulated blast furnace slag cement concrete. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 8, 157–164.
Environmental Protection Agency. (2022). Coal ash basics. Retrieved July 25, 2022, from https://www.epa.gov/coalash/coal-ash-basics
Farhoud, A. M., Mansour, M., Shoukry, R. M., El Bagoury, O., El Akkad, S., Farag, M., Hamza, A., El Nahas, E., Hussam, A., & Abou-Zeid, M. N. (2018). Use of EVA foam in Portland cement concrete. In Proceedings of CSCE 2018 Fredericton Annual Conference.
Gautam, S. P., Srivastava, V., & Agarwal, V. C. (2012). Use of glass wastes as fine aggregate in concrete. Journal of Academic and Industrial Research, 1(6), 320–322.
Griffiths, S., Sovacool, B. K., Del Rio, D. D. F., Foley, A. M., Bazilian, M. D., Kim, J., & Uratani, J. M. (2023). Decarbonizing the cement and concrete industry: A systematic review of socio-technical systems, technological innovations, and policy options. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 180, 113291.
Gruyaert, E., Van den Heede, P., Maes, M., & De Belie, N. (2010). A comparative study of the durability of ordinary Portland cement concrete and concrete containing (high) percentages of blast-furnace slag. In International RILEM Conference on Material Science (pp. 241–251). RILEM Publications.
Hardjito, D., Wallah, S. E., Sumajouw, D. M., & Rangan, B. V. (2004). On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 101(6), 467–472.
International Energy Agency. (2022). Cement technology roadmap for Indonesia.
Ismail, Z. Z., & Al-Hashmi, E. A. (2009). Recycling of waste glass as a partial replacement for fine aggregate in concrete. Waste Management, 29(2), 655–659.
Kathirvel, P., Saravanarajamohan, K., Shobana, S., & Bhaskar, A. (2013). Effect of replacement of slag on the mechanical properties of flyash based geopolymer concrete. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (IJET), 5, 2555–2559.
Khan, K. A., Ahmad, I., & Alam, M. (2019a). Effect of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) on the setting time of cement at different temperatures as well as on the mechanical strength of concrete. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44, 4075–4084.
Khan, K. A., Nasir, H., Alam, M., Wali Khan, S., Ahmad, I., & Rehman, Z. U. (2019b). Investigation of fresh and hardened characteristics of self-compacting concrete with the incorporation of ethylene vinyl acetate and steel-making slag. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019(1), 9146343.
Osborne, G. J. (1999). Durability of Portland blast-furnace slag cement concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 21(1), 11–21.
Picvisa. (2020, July 30). Glass recycling increases by 30% in Spain. Retrieved July 25, 2022, from https://picvisa.com/en/glass-recycling-increases-spain/
Portland Cement Association. (2021). U.S. cement industry roadmap to carbon neutrality.
Proctor, D. M., Fehling, K. A., Shay, E. C., Wittenborn, J. L., Green, J. J., Avent, C., & Rubin, C. S. (2000). Physical and chemical characteristics of blast furnace, basic oxygen furnace, and electric arc furnace steel industry slags. Environmental Science & Technology, 34(8), 1576–1582.
Qaidi, S., Najm, H. M., Abed, S. M., Özkılıç, Y. O., Al Dughaishi, H., Alosta, M., & Milad, A. (2022). Concrete containing waste glass as an environmentally friendly aggregate: A review on fresh and mechanical characteristics. Materials, 15(18), 6222.
Singh, N. B., Kumar, M., & Rai, S. (2020). Geopolymer cement and concrete: Properties. Materials Today: Proceedings, 29, 743–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.513
Statista. (2021, April 7). Indonesia: Steel production 2018. Retrieved July 25, 2022, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1031544/indonesia-steel-production/
Statista. (2022). Steel production figures U.S. 2006–2021. Retrieved July 25, 2022, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/209343/steel-production-in-the-us/
Trading Economics. (n.d.-a). Spain steel production. Retrieved July 25, 2022, from https://tradingeconomics.com/spain/steel-production
Trading Economics. (n.d.-b). Trading economics: 20 million indicators for 196 countries. Retrieved July 25, 2022, from https://tradingeconomics.com/egypt/steel-production
Verma, M., Dev, N., Rahman, I., Nigam, M., Ahmed, M., & Mallick, J. (2022). Geopolymer concrete: A material for sustainable development in Indian construction industries. Crystals, 12(4), Article 514. http://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040514
World Population Review. (2023). Water stress by country. Retrieved July 23, 2023, from https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/water-stress-by-country
Copyright (c) 2026 Maya Ghataty, Malak Soliman, Tahany Abdelaziz, Kareem Shehab, Karim Omran, Mayer Farag, Reem Gamal, Yosra El Maghraby, Tamer Breakah, Mohamed Nagib Abou-Zeid

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.