Evaluating the Compressive Strength of Concrete Different Water - Cement Ratio

  • Joseph Kilani Abiodun Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and Building Science, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus, Roodepoort, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • Abdulwahab Rasheed Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and Building Science, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus, Roodepoort, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • Deborah Ikotun Bolanle Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and Building Science, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus, Roodepoort, Johannesburg, South Africa
Keywords: Compressive Strength, Sustainable Concrete, Water – Cement Ratio, Infrastructures

Abstract

The performance of concrete is greatly influenced by the proportion of its constituting materials. Despite concrete having rightful content of binder and mineral fillers, the amount of water used for its production has significant effects on its characteristics. The standard concrete mix design influences the characteristics performance of concrete and plays significant roles in the development of quality and sustainable concrete. This study evaluates the effect of different water - cement ratios (0.6 and 0.43) on the density, workability, and compressive strength of concrete. In the experiment, concrete mix of 1:2:3 with 0.6 and 0.43 water – cement ratios were used. The workability was assessed through slump test in accordance with SANS5862-1:2006, while the compressive strength test was done on 100 x 100 x100 concrete cubes in accordance with SANS5863: 2006. The densities were measured before the compressive strength tests were performed. The slump values obtained from the concrete with 0.6 and 0.43 water – cement (w/c) ratios were 80 mm and 70 mm respectively. The concrete with 0.6 and 0.43 w/c ratios have density range of 2310 – 2434.5 kg/m3 and 2332.5 – 2398.5 kg/m3, respectively. The concrete’s compressive strengths with 0.43 w/c ratio exceeds that of 0.6 by 59.09, 30.54 and 29.66 % at 3, 7 and 28 days, accordingly. In conclusion, concrete with 0.43 w/c ratio gave better compressive strength and is recommended for the construction of high-rise buildings and infrastructures.

References

Aïtcin, P.-C. (2016). The importance of the water–cement and water–binder ratios. In Science and technology of concrete admixtures (pp. 3–13). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100693-1.00001-1

ASTM International. (1980). Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates (ASTM C136-06). ASTM International.

Ayanlere, S. A., Ajamu, S. O., Odeyemi, S. O., Ajayi, O. E., & Kareem, M. A. (2023). Effects of water-cement ratio on bond strength of concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings, 86, 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.686

Bureau of Indian Standards. (1975). Specification for ordinary Portland cement, 33 grade (2nd rev.) (IS 269:1975, reaffirmed 2015). BIS.

Bureau of Indian Standards. (1991). Specification for Portland pozzolana cement, Part 1: Fly ash based (IS 1489-1:1991). BIS.

Bureau of Indian Standards. (1963). Methods of test for aggregates for concrete, Part 3: Specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking (IS 2386-3:1963). BIS. https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.2386.3.1963

Ejiogu, I. K., Mamza, P. A. P., Nkeonye, P. O., & Yaro, S. A. (2018). Effects of water-cement ratio and cure days on the strength and workability of normal concrete blocks. International Journal of Innovative Scientific & Engineering Technologies Research, 6(2), 11–18. http://www.seahipaj.org

Kilani, A. J., Abdulwahab, R., & Ikotun, B. D. (2026). Modelling of structural performance and sustainability of concrete produced with different water–cement ratio and superplasticizer using multi-linear regression model. Chemistry of Inorganic Materials, 8, Article 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cinorg.2026.100145

South African Bureau of Standards. (2006). Concrete tests — Compressive strength of hardened concrete (SANS 5863:2006). SABS.

South African Bureau of Standards. (2006). Concrete tests — Consistence of freshly mixed concrete (SANS 5862-1:2006). SABS.

South African Bureau of Standards. (2006). Method of testing cement, Part 3 (SANS 50196-3:2006, Ed. 2). SABS. https://www.afrisam.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2010277-AfriSam-Technical-Ref-Guide-update-2021.pdf

South African Bureau of Standards. (2011). Admixtures for concrete, mortar and grout, Part 2: Concrete admixtures — Definitions, requirements, conformity, marking and labelling (SANS 50934-2:2011). SABS. https://www.gpwonline.co.za

South African Bureau of Standards. (2011). Civil engineering test methods, Part AG20: Determination of the bulk density, apparent density and water absorption of aggregate particles retained on the 5 mm sieve for road construction material (SANS 3001-AG20:2011). SABS. https://www.sabs.co.za

South African Bureau of Standards. (2013). Cement, Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cement (SANS 50197-1:2013). SABS. https://img.antpedia.com/standard/files/pdfs_ora/20210202/SANS%2050197-1-2013.pdf

UltraTech Cement (n.d.). Why the Right Water Cement Ratio is Crucial for Your Home? Retrieved (2021) from https://www.ultratechcement.com/for-homebuilders/home-building-explained--single/descriptive-articles/how-to-calculate-the-water-cement-ratio#

Vladimir, Ž. (2009). Effects of the very low water/cement ratio. Construction and Building Materials, 23(12), 3579–3582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.03.014

Wei, L. (2021). Analysis of the influence of water-cement ratio on concrete strength. E3S Web of Conferences, 283, Article 01016. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128301016

Published
2026-06-30
How to Cite
Abiodun , J. K., Rasheed , A., & Bolanle, D. I. (2026). Evaluating the Compressive Strength of Concrete Different Water - Cement Ratio. Journal of Building Materials and Structures, 13(1), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.34118/jbms.v13i1.4569
Section
Short Communication