Political Economy of Climate Governance, Environmental Quality and Sustainable Development in Nigeria:

Role of Institutional Quality as a Moderator

Keywords: Climate governance, Environmental quality, Sustainable development, Institutional quality, Political economy

Abstract

This paper explores the complex nexus between climate governance, environmental quality and sustainable development in Nigeria from a political economy perspective. The study specifically includes the moderating effect of the institutional quality. The research used a mixed-method design, combining structured survey data (N = 450) from six geopolitical representative states with thematic qualitative insights. Descriptive statistics, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and thematic synthesis were used to analyse these dynamics. Empirical findings investigate that current climate governance initiatives have a positive but weak direct impact on environmental quality and sustainable development, structural bottlenecks, including rent-seeking behaviours, institutional fragmentation, and regulatory capture, severely undermine climate governance policies. Crucially, the moderation analysis demonstrates that institutional quality is a critical facilitator; the interaction between climate governance and institutional quality has a strongly significant positive effect on both environmental quality and measures of long-term sustainable development. The findings underline the fact that any technical or financial solutions to climate change in Nigeria are likely to remain largely sub-optimal without a systematic overhaul of governance structures. The study calls for the institutional divorce of environmental regulatory bodies from political interference, the formal inclusion of subnational actors into the national climate architecture, and the establishment of a clear and protected management frameworks for green assets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adebayo, W. G. (2025). Resilience in the face of ecological challenges: Strategies for integrating environmental considerations into social policy planning in Africa.Sustainable Development, 33(1), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3113

Adeyemi, A., Barry, A., Olayinka, A.E. & Alex. (2025). Governance quality andsustainable development: Insights from United Nations sustainable development goalsin Africa. Public Organization Review, 25(2): 439-464. Doi: 10.1007/s11115-025-00810-7

Epor, S. O., & Akande, J. O. (2025). Sustainable development in emerging economies: Comparing the impacts of green finance and financial inclusion. Modern Finance, 3(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.61351/mf.v3i4.259

Lu, Z., Bao. K., Hu, X., GAO, C., Wen, Y., & Zhang, T. (2025). Climate governanceaction and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from climate resilient cityconstruction. Front. Environ. Sci. 13 :1651610. Doi. 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1651610

Ferdi, A. (2025). Global uncertainty, institutional quality, financial development, and foreign direct investment inflows. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 35(2), 382-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2025.2459911

Ishaku, P. A. (2026). Economic growth, energy consumption, and environmentaldegradation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A dynamic panel analysis of the environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis (1999-2025). International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 10(6), 7906-7919, https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600551

Naxera, V., & Krčál, P. (2025). Ideological discourses of anti-corruption in the Czech way: Similarities and discrepancies between parties, governments, and official anti- corruption strategies. Public Integrity, 27(1), 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2024.2448873

Oanh, T. T.K., & Dinh, L. Q. (2024). Digital financial inclusion, financial stability, andsustainable development: Evidence from a quantile-on-quantile regression and waveletcoherence. Sustainable Development, 32(6), 6324-6338.https://doi.org/10.1002?sd.3021

Oluwafemi, A. P. (2026). Political and institutional barriers to effective climategovernance in Nigeria. Impact International Journal of Sciences, Education and Arts,2(2), 1247–1259. https://impactinternationaljournals.com/publications/index.php/ojs/article/view/495

Saboori, B., Mahdavian, S. M., & Radmehr, R. (2024). Assessing the environmental impact of institutional quality at aggregate and disaggregate levels: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in MENA countries. Sustainable Environment, 10(1), Article 2426833. https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2024.2426833

Shittu, I., Abdul Latiff, A. R., & Baharudin, S. A. (2024). Assessing the compensation and reinvestment plans for fuel subsidy rationalization in Nigeria: A dynamiccomputable general equilibrium approach. Energy Policy, 293(C), 114–128.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114012

Udoinyang, N. (2025). Climate change, ecosystem and the economy of Nigeria.Existentia: Concrescence Journal of Arts and Humanities, 3(1).https://journals.casjournals.com/index.php/ECOJAH/article/view/54

Widianingsih, I., Abdillah, A., & Adikancana, Q. M. (2024). Inclusive developmentpolicy research: Research identification, and future agenda. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), Article 2356054. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2356054

Zhao, Z. (2026). Climate governance and corporate sustainable development performance: Evidence from climate-resilient urban development. Frontiers inEnvironmental Science, 14, Article 1874173. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1874173

Published
2026-09-30
How to Cite
Udoinyang, N. (2026). Political Economy of Climate Governance, Environmental Quality and Sustainable Development in Nigeria:. Social Empowerment Journal, 8(3), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.34118/sej.v8i3.4869
Section
Articles