Are African Teachers Ready for Artificial Intelligence? Decomposing Teacher Competencies and the Role of Initial and In-Service Training: Evidence from PASEC

Keywords: teacher competencies, AI readiness, teacher education, in-service training, PASEC, sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

Enthusiasm for artificial intelligence (AI) in African education is outpacing the conditions required for AI to improve teaching and learning. Because large-scale African datasets do not yet measure AI use, this study reframes the question and argues that teachers' professional competencies are the prerequisite for any successful AI integration: AI does not replace the teacher but transforms the teacher's role, and its benefits depend on teachers' content and pedagogical knowledge, qualifications and continuing training. Drawing on the PASEC2019 teacher assessment across 14 Francophone African education systems (19,141 teachers), the study measures teacher content and pedagogical (didactic) knowledge, decomposes their variance across teachers, schools and countries using three-level models on plausible values, quantifies the contribution of pre-service qualification and in-service training with design-based estimates using PASEC replicate weights, and builds a Teacher AI-Readiness Index (TARI) to rank the systems. Results show that about 39% of the variance in teacher competence lies between countries, indicating highly unequal AI-readiness foundations. Holding a professional teaching diploma (associated with gains of +15 to +27 points across dimensions) and receiving in-service training (+9 to +12 points) are the strongest and most robust correlates of competence, together with classroom electricity, whereas the sheer duration of initial training or the number of in-service domains adds nothing. The ranking reveals wide gaps, from Gabon, Senegal and Benin at the top to Chad, DR Congo and Madagascar at the bottom. These findings align with, and can help target, the teacher-centred priority reforms that many countries are pursuing through their GPE partnership compacts. The study concludes that credible AI-in-education strategies in Africa must first invest in teacher qualification and continuing training, a condition, not a mere precursor, of AI’s effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Columbia University Press.
Bold, T., Filmer, D., Martin, G., Molina, E., Stacy, B., Rockmore, C., Svensson, J., & Wane, W. (2017). Enrollment without learning: Teacher effort, knowledge, and skill in primary schools in Africa. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(4), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.4.185
PASEC. (2020). PASEC2019 – Qualité des systèmes éducatifs en Afrique subsaharienne francophone. Programme d'analyse des systèmes éducatifs de la CONFEMEN. https://archivespasec.confemen.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/08/Rapport-international-evaluation-PASEC2019.pdf
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report
Global Partnership for Education. (n.d.). Partnership compact guidelines. https://www.globalpartnership.org/content/partnership-compact-guidelines
Global Partnership for Education. (2021). GPE 2025 strategic plan. https://www.globalpartnership.org/library/gpe-2025-strategic-plan
Global Partnership for Education. (2024a). Teachers as architects of change in education policy dialogue [Blog post]. https://www.globalpartnership.org/blog/teachers-architects-change-education-policy-dialogue
Global Partnership for Education. (2024b). Results report 2024. https://www.globalpartnership.org/content/results-report-2024
Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2006). Teacher quality. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2, pp. 1051–1078). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0692(06)02018-6
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., & Zhang, H. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
Popova, A., Evans, D. K., Breeding, M. E., & Arancibia, V. (2022). Teacher professional development around the world: The gap between evidence and practice. The World Bank Research Observer, 37(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab006
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316696
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084
von Davier, M., Gonzalez, E., & Mislevy, R. J. (2009). What are plausible values and why are they useful? IERI Monograph Series, 2, 9–36.
World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education's promise. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1096-1
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Published
2026-10-31
How to Cite
Hilaire, H. (2026). Are African Teachers Ready for Artificial Intelligence? Decomposing Teacher Competencies and the Role of Initial and In-Service Training: Evidence from PASEC. Social Empowerment Journal, 8(4), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.34118/sej.v8i4.4907