Exploring EFL Written Expression Teachers' Perspectives towards The Use of Digital Scoring Rubrics to Assess Students’ Writing Skill
Abstract
The present study aims at exploring EFL written expression teachers’ views and perspectives towards using one of the ICT tools in assessing students’ writing skill called the digital scoring rubric. For the sake of gathering relevant data to the study and achieving its objectives, the quantitative method has been used. A questionnaire was administered to a purposive sample that consists of eleven (11) teachers of Written Expression at the Department of English, University 8 Mai 1945, Guelma, Algeria, and the data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively.
The findings indicated that the majority of participants had positive attitudes towards the benefits of using electronic rubrics in assessing the writing ability of EFL learners; however, they confirmed that some challenges impeded the application of this process in the Algerian University, especially the internet access and the lack of teacher training in using appropriate tools for assessing students’ writing electronically. Therefore, it is highly recommended to organize workshops for teachers and to suggest useful steps that would help them in using effective assessment procedures in the digital age; particularly, for assessing the writing skill in the 21st century.
Metrics
References
Becker, A. (2011). Examining Rubrics Used to Measure Writing Performance in US Intensive English Programs. CATESOL Journal, USA, 22(1), 113-130.
Beyreli, L., & Ari, G. (2009). The Use of Analytic Rubric in the Assessment of Writing Performance--Inter-Rater Concordance Study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, Tukey, 9(1), 105-125.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge, New York.
Cooper, B. S., & Gargan, A. (2011). Rubrics in education: old term, new meanings. Educational Horizons, Bloomington, 89(4), 6-8.
Dörnyei, Z., (2002). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge. London.
Ghalib, T. K., & Al-Hattami, A. A. (2015). Holistic versus Analytic Evaluation of EFL Writing: A Case Study. English Language Teaching, Yemen, 8(7), 225-236.
Greg, Jung. (2019). Orange Slice Teacher Rubric Add-On. Retrieved 20th August 2021, from: https://theedtechworkshop.com/2019/11/21/orange-slice-teacher-rubric-add-on/
Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). The scope of writing assessment. Assessing writing, New York, 8(1), 5-16.
Hamp-Lyons, L., & Con, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio principles for practice, theory and research. Hampton Press, New Jersey.
Herman, J. L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria.
Hughes, Arthur. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge University Press, UK.
Huot, B. (1990). The literature of direct writing assessment: Major concerns and prevailing trends. Review of Educational research, Louisville, 60(2), 237-263.
Lallmamode, S. P., Daud, N. M., & Kassim, N. L. A. (2016). Development and initial argument-based validation of a scoring rubric used in the assessment of L2 writing electronic portfolios. Assessing Writing, Malaysia, 30, 44-62.
Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: What, when and how?. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, USA, 7(1), 3.
Raddawi, R., & Bilikozen, N. (2018). ELT Professors’ Perspectives on the Use of E-rubrics in an Academic Writing Class in a University in the UAE. In Assessing EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world (pp. 221-260). Palgrave Macmillan, Switserland.
Selke, M. J. G. (2013). Rubric assessment goes to college: Objective, comprehensive evaluation of student work. R&L Education, USA.
Senel, Esma. (2021). Orange Slice Teacher Rubric. Retrieved 15 August 2021, from: https://www.tesol.org/connect/tesol-resource-center/search-details/assessments/2021/06/17/orangeslice-teacher-rubric.
Weigle, Sara C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press, UK.
Yancey, K. B. (1999). Looking back as we look forward: Historicizing writing assessment. College composition and communication, USA, 50(3), 483-503.
Copyright (c) 2022 Social Sciences Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
