Philosophy of dialogue in Karl Popper's wheelers
Abstract
Dialogue is a human phenomenon emerged as a result of the difference among human beings in their thoughts and views, whether it is religion, ideology or thought. These differences led to conflicts, some of them end in disagreement and others end in agreement and peace. Karl Popper uses dialogue as a means of spreading knowledge and science that inherited from philosophers of the Greek era, such as Socrates, to the modern and contemporary era, such as Habermas.
In this work, we want to respond to Karl Popper's analysis of the clash of civilizations and the importance of using dialogue to avoid humanitarian disasters and serve the entire human civilization. The world wars are a clear proof of the lack of constructive dialogue between all the conflicting parties.
Metrics
References
Baudouin, J., (1994). La philosophie politique de Karl Popper. Puf
CHABEL, M. F., (1974). Political Thought, Comparative Studies of Political and Social Doctrines, Part 1, The General Egyptian Book Organization.
DE CHRIS, A., & MINOUH, K., (1996). Translation and study of Nassar Abdullah, the Egyptian Book Authority.
Hauriou, A., (1977). Constitutional Law and Political Institutions, a translation of a group of professors. I 2, part one. Eligibility for publication and distribution
Karl, P., (2001). On the clash of civilizations from the book In Search of a Better World, translated by Ahmed Mostagir. Egyptian Book Authority, Family Library.
Karl, P., (2003). Frame legend. In Defense of Science and Rationality, translated by Youmna Tarif Al-Khouli. Kuwait, National Council for Culture, Arts and Literature.
Karl, P., (2006). Opinions publique et opinions libéraux. In Conjectures et réfutations. La croissance du savoir scientifique. Edition Payot.
Copyright (c) 2021 Social Sciences Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
