Investigating Metacognitive Awareness among Algerian EFL University Teachers of Academic Writing
Abstract
Teaching writing has always been subject for debate in EFL studies. One of the aspects of this controversy is teaching writing and metacognition. Metacognitive strategies are organizational strategies which regulate and control thinking. These strategies apply to both students and teachers and investigating the issue from both standpoints is a must. Plenty of research has been conducted with regard to student metacognition but not as many studies focused on the teacher. The present study aims to fill this void by investigating metacognitive awareness among Algerian EFL university writing teachers as well as their motivation, beliefs, and attitudes towards the teaching of writing in university settings. A metacognition awareness raising questionnaire was administered to eight university teachers from two different universities in order to explore the three components of their metacognitive knowledge: person, task, and strategy knowledge. The results of the survey revealed that Algerian EFL writing teachers are metacognitively aware about their teaching and that they have positive attitudes, beliefs, and are motivated to teach writing.
References
Blasco, J. A. (2016). The relationship between writing anxiety, writing self-efficacy, and Spanish EFL students’ use of metacognitive writing strategies: a case study. Journal of English Studies, 14, 7-45.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F.E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Christmas, B. (2011). The role of brainstorming in improving students writing performance in theEFL classroom. [Online]Available: http://sydney.edu.au/cet/docs/research/The%20Role%20of%20Brainstorming%20in%20Improving%20Students%2 0Writing.pdf (October 12, 2011).
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.
Cross, D. R. & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L.B. (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. (4th edition). Harlow: Longman. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003368820103200109
Hartman, H.J. (2001b). Teaching metacognitively. In H.J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 149-172). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Hennessey, M. G. (1999). Probing the dimensions of metacognition: Implications for conceptual change teaching-learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
Jacobs, J.E., & Paris, S.G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3 & 4), 255-278.
Kuhn, D. & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268-273.
McMullen, M.G. (2009). Using language learning strategies to improve the writing skills of Saudi EFL students: Will it really work? System, 73(3), 418-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.05.001
metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131-142.
Mu, C. (2005). A taxonomy of ESL writing strategies. In Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice, May 30-June 1, 2005 (pp. 1-10). Singapore.
Newman, D., Catavero, C., & Wright, L. (2012). Students fail to transfer knowledge of chromosome structure to topics pertaining to cell division. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 425-436.
Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17, 235-247.
Oxford, R.L. (2003). Language Learning Styles and Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle.
Paris, S.G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 1551). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Petric, B &, Czarl, B. (2003). Validating a Writing Strategy Questionnaire. System. 31,187-215.
Purpura, J. (1999). An analysis of the relationships between test takers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 47, p. 289-325.
Scarcella, R.& Oxford, R. (1992). The Tapestry of Language Learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston, Ma: Heinle&Heinle Publishers.
Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In H.J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 3-16). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Wenden, A. (1991). Metacognitive Strategies in L2 Writing: A case for task knowledge. J. E.Alatis (Ed.)., Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, p. 302-231. Any publishing house and place?
Wenden, A. L. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. London: Prentice Hall.
Copyright (c) 2022 Social Sciences Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
