Contribution of communication technology in achieving the conditions of communicative action in the university environment - The Progress University Platform as a model
Abstract
The goal of this study revolves around analyzing Habermas's theory of communicative action and the conditions for its realization through the Progress platform, as one of the products of communication technology, by referring to the critical school starting from Marxism to Habermasiancommunicativeism.
There is no doubt that Habermas’s theory, with its combination of philosophy and sociology, is considered one of the most important socio-communicative theories in the twenty-first century. It aims to establish dialogue, consultation and understanding in various fields through communication. Through communication technology via the Progress platform, communicative action appears through the open and permanent communication it allows. Through the concepts of theory, and the common understanding it provides between the parties participating in the dialogue.
With the results we have reached, it becomes clear to us what the Progress platform can provide as a working tool and support for producing effective communicative action by providing an environment that increases the strength and effectiveness of meaningful dialogue, which contributes to building a civilized and cohesive society based on mutual understanding among its members.
References
عمار بوحوش، و محمد محمود الذنيبات. (2007). مناهج البحث العلمي وطرق إعداد البحوث (المجلد ط4). بن عكنون الجزائر: ديوان المطبوعات الجامعية.
فوزي عبد الله العكش. (1986). البحث العلمي، المناهج والإجراءات. العين، الإمارات العربية المتحة: مطبعة العين الحديثة.
يورغان هابرماس، ت: فتحي المسكيني. (2020). نظرية الفعل التواصلي، المجلد الثاني، في نقد العقل الوظيفي (المجلد ط1). الظعاين، قطر: المركز العربي للأبحاث والدراسات السياسية.
نيابة مديرية الجامعة المكلفة بالبيداغوجيا، جامعة باتنة. (2021). منصة PROGRES. تاريخ الاسترداد 06 جانفي, 2025، من جامعة باتنة 1: https://vrp.univ-batna.dz/index.php/ar/2018-03-01-09-25-56
McCarthy, T. (1987). Habermas J.: The Theory of Communicative Action Trns. Boston: BeaconPress V2.
Arabic-Romanized references:
Ammār Būhūsh, wa-Muḥammad Maḥmūd al-Dhanībāt. (2007). Manāhij al-Baḥth al-‘Ilmī wa-Ṭuruq I‘dād al-Buḥūth (al-Mujallad Ṭ4). Bin ‘Aknūn al-Jazā’ir: Dīwān al-Maṭbū‘āt al-Jāmi‘iyya.
Fawzī ‘Abd Allāh al-‘Aksh. (1986). al-Baḥth al-‘Ilmī, al-Manāhij wa-l-Ijrā’āt. al-‘Ayn, al-Imārāt al-‘Arabiyya al-Muttaḥida: Maṭba‘at al-‘Ayn al-Ḥadītha.
Ḥasan Muṣaddiq. (2005). Yūrghān Hābirmās wa-madrasat Fārnfūrāt, al-Naẓariyya al-Naqdiyya al-Tawāṣuliyya (al-Mujallad Ṭ1). al-Dār al-Bayḍā’, al-Maghrib: al-Markaz al-Thaqāfī al-‘Arabī.
Yūrghān Hābirmās, t: Fatḥī al-Miskīnī. (2020). Naẓariyyat al-Fi‘l al-Tawāṣulī, al-Mujallad al-Thānī, fī Naqd al-‘Aql al-Wiẓā’ī (al-Mujallad Ṭ1). al-Ẓa‘āyin, Qaṭar: al-Markaz al-‘Arabī li-l-Abḥāth wa-l-Dirāsāt al
