The application of New Public Management in the enterprises
Abstract
Major tenets of this recent market-led restructuring of the public sector are presented as the so-called New Public Management (NPM (, which has been touted by some authors as administration revolution or post-bureaucratic paradigm, In line with the common tendency in social sciences to reify ideas not really profound into something as significant as a revolution or paradigm, many management experts portrayed the contemporary public sector reforms as a paradigm shift, According to its proponents, the newly emerging paradigm of NPM is characterized by managerial freedom, market-driven competition, businesslike service delivery, value-for money, result-based performance, client-orientation, and a pro-market culture, For other scholars, however, there is no paradigmatic consensus on NPM: it at best represents a loose collection of ideas derived from the private sector, used by different countries, and propagated by international organizations and advanced market economies. In addition the techno-managerial interpretations of NPM by its proponents do not adequately explain its historical causes, ideological underpinnings, socioeconomic consequences and politico-administrative limitations.
Public administration has always been under constant review. Such reviews were mostly parochial, incremental, initiated or driven by low-key staff and often ended as fads. From the end of the 1970s to the 1990s, however, governments around the world were engaged in widespread and sustained reforms of their public administration. These reforms were born out of economic recession, but also had political and social drivers. They were initiated by the political apex and fuelled by New Right ideology. Collectively, these reforms came to be termed New Public Management (NPM).
NPM is characterized by marketisation, privatization, managerialism, governance, performance measurement and accountability.
This employment of corporate attitudes in public administration is grounded on certain theories, mainly public choice, transaction cost analysis and principal–agent theory.
In case of Algeria There are many problems like Bureaucracy and corruption and Nepotism in very big levels and especially in the public sector so it had to make to Shed light about the ability to Applied the principles of the new public management and the governance to try to Limit the Constraints who Stand up in the face of the Algerian public institutions in the way of Submitting a public services with good quality and to help the national economy by the base of Effectiveness and efficiency.
References
2- DUNLEAVY, "New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, (2005).
3- GEROND. G, " Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management", International Public Management Journal 4 (2001) 1–25, Hamburg, Germany.
4- HALPEM. C, New Public Management, Weisbrod B A et al. Public Interest Law: An Economic and Institutional Analysis. University of California Press, CA, USA, 1978.
5- KABOOLIAN, L, "The New Public Management: Challenging the Boundaries of the Management vs. Administration Debate", Public Administration Review, (1998).
6- LIENERT. I, Are Laws Needed for Public Management Reforms? An International Comparison, International Monetary Fund, 2005.
7- LYNN, L, "New Public Management ", (2006).
8- POLLITT, C, "The New Public Management: An Overview of Its Current Status", Public Management Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, article 08, 2007.
9- PROMBERGER. K, New Public Management, Universitat Innsbruck, Austria, 2003.
10- TOLOFARI . S, New Public Management and Education , Policy Futures in Education, Volume 3, Number 1, Glasgow, UK, 2005 .
