Autocratic Leadership and Authority: A Comparative Analysis of Max Weber and Michel Crozier's Concepts
Abstract
This research aims to explore the concepts of autocratic and authoritarian leadership through a comparative analysis of the theories of Max Weber and Michel Crozier. Weber's model highlights bureaucratic authority within a rational-legal framework, while Crozier emphasizes the role of organizational dynamics and the management of uncertainty in power relations. Comparing these two theorists demonstrates differing perspectives on leadership authority. Weber’s bureaucratic model enhances efficiency and predictability, whereas Crozier underscores the significance of informal dynamics and the need for adaptability and responsiveness. By integrating these two perspectives, we gain a more nuanced understanding of authoritarian leadership that acknowledges both the strengths and limitations of each approach. This comprehensive perspective is significant for contemporary leaders navigating complex organizational landscapes, where traditional hierarchies may not always apply.
References
Abdullah Masfer Al-Waqdani. (2010). Reformulating Max Weber’s Theory on Bureaucracy. King Abdulaziz University Journal of Arts and Humanities, Saudi Arabia.
Al-Agha Rafiq Helmi. (2003). The role of managerial leadership in development and administrative growth. The Fourth Annual Conference on Creative Leadership for the Development and Growth of Institutions in the Arab World. Damascus.
Al-Azhari Ben Issa. (2023). An Analytical Reading of the Concept of Power in Organizational Thinking. Al-Sawra Journal of Human and Social Studies. Volume 9, Issue 3.
Alili Kheira. (2022). The Impact of Exercising Power on Job Satisfaction and Job Discipline in Algerian Public Administration – Tlemcen Wilaya. A Thesis Presented for the Doctorate in Science Degree – Department: Management Sciences, Specialization: Human Resource Management.
Bekhouche Oussama, Badraoui Soufiane. (2024). Organizational Communication and Workgroups According to the Strategic Analysis Theory. The Journal of El-Ryssala for Media Studies. Volume 08, Issue 01.
Chaouech Hamid. (2021). Weber’s Bureaucratic Organization in the Core of Organizational Sociology. Human Sciences Journal, Volume 32, Issue 4.
Hanan Ali Aouada. (2013). Power according to Max Weber. Professor Journal, issued by the College of Education Ibn Rushd for Human Sciences, University of Baghdad, Issue 206, Volume 1.
Laiana Carvalho Dos Santos. (2017). O Fenômeno Burocrático em Max Weber e Michel Crozier. Federal University of Amazonas - UFAM Institute of Human Sciences and Letters (ICHL), Postgraduate Program in Sociology (PPGS).
Mohamed Sorour Hariri. (2016). Rules of Psychoanalysis and Psychological and Behavioral Therapy. Dar Al-Minhali.
Muhammad Asrar-ul-Haq, Sadie Anwar. (2018). The many faces of leadership: Proposing a research agenda through a review of literature. Future Business Journal.
Saadi Mohammedi. (2021). Models of Contemporary Management. Dar Al-Yazouri Scientific Publishing and Distribution.
Sahraoui Hamama, Ben Ramadane Samia. (2022). Strategic action of the actor within the system: A strategic analysis approach by Michel Crozier. Journal of Social Studies and Research. Volume 10, Issue 1.
Sahraoui Hamama. (2023). Strategic Action of the Technical Engineer in Bureaucratic Organization: A Field Study at the Gas Cylinder Company. Journal of Research in Human and Social Sciences. Volume 14, Issue 2.
Samar Khalaf Allah Al-Zanati. (2024). Trump and Biden: Analyzing Journalistic Discourse. Arab Publishing and Distribution.
Vasileva Nadezhada, Angelova. (2021). The impact of leadership style on employee motivation in the automotive industry. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR).
Veliu, L., Mimoza, M., Visar, D., & Liridon, J. (2017). The influence of leadership styles on employee performance. Vadyba Journal of Management.
Zhen Wang, Yuanliu L. (2019). Authoritarian leadership and task performance: The effects of leader-member exchange and dependence on the leader. Frontiers of Business Research in China.
