The Position of Islamic Jurisprudence and International Law on Armed Resistance The Palestinian Armed Resistance as a Model

Halimi mohamed dhiya elhak Halimi mohamed dhiya elhak

doi:10.34118/jskp.v5i01.4252

Halimi mohamed dhiya elhak Halimi mohamed dhiya elhak Ez-Zitouna University tunisia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9831-7492

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34118/jskp.v5i01.4252

Keywords: Armed resistance; Al-Aqsa Flood; Palestinian armed resistance; Jihad;

Abstract

This research paper aims to clarify the positions of Islamic jurisprudence and international law regarding armed resistance in general, and Palestinian armed resistance in particular, especially in light of the ongoing debate about the legitimacy of this resistance in achieving its goals, particularly after the Al-Aqsa Flood battle and its significant outcomes on all levels. One of the key findings is the positive stance of both Islamic jurisprudence and international law towards armed resistance in affirming the right of peoples to defend themselves and their right to self-determination, using various means including the use of armed force. From the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence, what armed resistance, including Palestinian resistance, is doing is considered a form of defensive jihad that is mandated by Islamic law for those who meet its conditions. From the perspective of international law, various international texts enshrine and support this right, affirming its legitimacy in the pursuit of freedom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu-Yusuf, a.-Q. (n.d). Al-Kharaj (1st ed). Cairo: Al-Azhar Library for Heritage.
Adlan, A. (s.d.). The Rulings on Resistance to the Zionist Enemy: The Al-Aqsa Deluge as a Model. Consulté le 02 2024, 2024, sur https://palscholars.org/news
Al-Anzi, R. H., & Al-Anzi, A. (2015, October). Armed Resistance under International Law Rules. Journal of Legal and Economic Research, 05(58), pp. 267-312.
Al-Bahuti. (2008). Kashaf al-Qina' 'an Matn al-Iqnai' (éd. 1st ed, Vol. 03). Saudi Arabia: Ministry of Justice.
al-Bajuri, I. i.-S. (n.d). Hashiya al-Bajuri on the Explanation of Ibn Qasim on the Text of Abu Shuja (Vol. 03). Jeddah: Dar al-Minhaj.
Al-Jamal, S. b.-A. (n.d). Hashiya al-Jamal ‘ala Sharh al-Minhaj (1st ed, Vol. 07). Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Kasani. (1426 AH). Bada'i' al-Sana'i' fi Tartib al-Shara'i (1st ed, Vol. 07). Egypt: Al-Matba'ah Sharikat al-Matbu'at al-'Ilmiyah.
al-Kubaisi, M. A. (2023, 12 13). The Impact of Power Balance on the Legitimacy of Resistance. Consulté le 03 23, 2024, sur https://www.aljazeera.net/blogs/
Al-Mardawi. (1995). Al-Insaf fi Ma'rifat al-Rajih min al-Khilaf (1st ed, Vol. 04). Cairo: Hijr Printing and Publishing.
Al-Nabih, A. (2017, 03 06). Historical Rights in Palestine. Consulté le 03 22, 2024, sur http//:www.aljazeera.net/net/blogs/
al-Qaradawi, Y. (2014). Fiqh al-Jihad (4th ed, Vol. 01). Cairo: Wahba Library.
al-Razi, Z. (1999). Al-Mukhtar al-Sihah ( 5 th ed). Cairo: Al-Maktabah Al-Asriyah.
Al-Shafi'i. (1402 AH). Al-Umm (2nd ed). Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
al-Sharbini, S. a.-D.-K. (n.d). , Al-Iqna’ in Resolving the Terms of Abi Shuja (Vol. 02). Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Shatibi. (1997). Al-Muwafaqat (1st ed, Vol. 01). Cairo: Dar Ibn Afan.
al-Zuhayli, a. o. (2003). The Document on the Concept of Terrorism and Resistance: An Arab-Islamic Perspective. Amman: Center for Middle Eastern Studies.
al-Zuhayli, W. (n.d). Islamic Jurisprudence and Its Evidence (4th ed, Vol. 01). Damascus: Dar al-Fikr.
Amer, S. a.-D. (1977). Popular Armed Resistance in International Public Law. Cairo: Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi.
Dehiya, A. (2019). Armed Resistance and the Legal Foundations of Its Legitimacy in International Armed Conflicts. Fourth National Forum on Applications of International Humanitarian Law - The Algerian Revolution as a Model: A Comparative Study (pp. 1-18). Ghardaia: Faculty of Law and Political Science.
Ibn-Abd-al-Barr, A.-M. (1980). Al-Kafi fi Fiqh Ahl al-Madina (2nd ed, Vol. 01). Riyadh: Riyadh Modern Library,.
Ibn-al-Qayyim. (1993). Al-Furusiyyah al-Muhammadiyyah (1st ed). Saudi Arabia: Dar al-Andalus.
Ibn-al-Qayyim. (1997). Ahkam Ahl al-Dhimma (1st ed, Vol. 03). Saudi Arabia: Ramadi Publishing.
Ibn-arfa. (2014). Al-Mukhtasar al-Fiqhiy (1st ed, Vol. 03). UAE: Al-Khalaf Ahmad Al-Habtoor Charitable Foundation.
Ibn-Hazm. (n.d). Al-Muhalla bi al-Athar (1st ed, Vol. 07). Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Ibn-Manzur. (1414 AH). Lisan al-Arab (3rd ed, Vol. 13). Beirut: Dar Sader.
Ibn-Qudamah. (1998). Al-Mughni (1 st ed, Vol. 09). Riyadh: Dar Ilm al-Kutub.
Ibn-Taymiyyah. (1418 AH). Al-Mustadrak Ali Majmu’ al-Fatawa (1st ed, Vol. 03). Riyadh: printed by Muhammad Abd al-Rahman Qasim.
ICJ. (2004). Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. La haye: International Court of Justice Reports.
ICJ. (2024). Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, July 19, , p. 73. La haye: The International Court of Justice.
Manaà, J. A. (2010). International Public Law (1st ed). Alexandria: Dar al-Fikr al-Jami'i,.
Muslim, i. a.-H.-N. (1955). Sahih Muslim (Vol. 01). Cairo: al-Babi al-Halabi Press.
Rabahi, L. (2014, June 15). Terrorism and Armed Resistance under Contemporary International Law Rules. Journal of Law and Human Sciences, 07(02), pp. 280-305.
Zaydi, W. (2018, September 15). The Legitimacy of Armed Resistance in International Law. Algerian Journal of Legal and Political Sciences, 55(03), pp. 401-428.