The Limits of Literary Analysis: Feminist Literary Criticism and Authorial Intentionalism

Keywords: Authorial Intentionalism, Death of the Author, Feminist Theory

Abstract

This article positions feminist literary criticism within the spectrum of authorial intentionalism and anti-authorial intentionalism, probing the necessity of referencing the author versus advocating for a detachment from authorial intent. It tends to probe whether feminist literary criticism favors referring to the author, or takes for granted the ability to reconstruct the author through his/her works. Based on textual readings of the literature on the topic, this article brings closer opposing views about the ability and inability of reconstructing the author by the analyst. Those opposing views consist of traditional literary criticism which calls for referencing the author on the one hand, and the concept of the ‘Death of the Author’ proposed by Roland Barthes which advocates an anti-authorial theoretical shift. This article arrived at the conclusion that feminist literary criticism aims for a delicate balance between acknowledging the author’s influence and embracing the ‘death of the author’ concept. Such a balance is crucial for a nuanced exploration of gender-related themes in literature.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Barthes, Roland. Image, Music, Text. FONTANA, 1999.

Bell, Erin. “Feminist Literary Criticism.” The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies, 2016, pp. 1–3., doi:10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss770.

Bressler, Charles E. Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Longman, 2011.

Guerin, Wilfred L., et al. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. Oxford University Press, 2005.

Huddleston, A. “The conversation argument for actual intentionalism.” The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 52, no. 3, 2012, pp. 241–256, https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ays020 .

Nannicelli, Ted. “Ethical criticism and the interpretation of art.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 75, no. 4, 2017, pp. 401–413, https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12395 .

Noviana, Fajria. “Gender Inequality in Japanese Fairy Tales with Female Main Character.” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 202, 2020, p. 07053, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020207053 .

Showalter, Elaine. “Towards a Feminist Poetics.” Twentieth Century Literary Theory: a Reader, edited by K. M. Newton, Macmillan Education, 1997, pp. 216–220.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. Routledge, 2014.

Tyson, Lois. Critical Theory Today: a User-Friendly Guide. Routledge, 2006.

Wimsatt, W. K., and Monroe C. Beardsley. “The Intentional Fallacy.” Authorship, 2019, pp. 90–100., https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474465519-0132

Published
2023-12-31
How to Cite
Bendouma , N., & Zitouni, M. Z. E. (2023). The Limits of Literary Analysis: Feminist Literary Criticism and Authorial Intentionalism. Social Empowerment Journal, 5(4), 03-12. https://doi.org/10.34118/sej.v5i4.3654
Section
Articles

Plum Analytics

Artifact Widget