Illegal Drug Market and Addiction: An Analytical Study According to Economic Theory of Addiction Causes and Economic Cost
Abstract
The drug problem is considered one of the problems that threatens the security and stability of societies, and no society has escaped from it on the face of the globe, whether it is drug-producing societies, consuming societies or societies that use their lands as transit areas. This prompted scientists from all specialties to pay attention to this scourge, and to try to explain the motives for drug abuse and addiction, as well as studying and analyzing the effects and damages can this problem causes on the individual and into entire society. In this regard, economists took an interest in the drug problem, trying to understand the phenomenon from an economic perspective, and highlighting the economic problems and damages that this problem causes to producing and consuming countries that are used as transit areas. Therefore, we will try in this paper to highlight the point of view of economists on the economic motive for drug abuse, and the economic consequences of this scourge on individuals and societies.
Downloads
References
الأمم المتحدة. (1988).اتفاقية الأمم المتحدة لمكافحة الاتجار غير المشروع في المخدرات والمؤثرات العقلية 1988. فيينا: الأمم المتحدة.
الديوان الوطني لمكافحة المخدرات والإدمان عليها. (2019).نشطات مكافحة المخدرات والإدمان عليها حصيلة الإحصائية لثمانية الأشهر الأولى لسنة 2019. الجزائر: الديوان الوطني لمكافحة المخدرات والإدمان عليها.
حسن السيد،عادل.(2008).طبيعة عمليات غسل الأموال وعلاقتها بانتشار المخدرات. الرياض: جامعة نايف العربية للعلوم الامنية.
سويف، مصطفى. (1996). المخدرات والمجتمع: نظرة تكاملية.الكويت: المجلس الوطني للثقافة والفنون والآداب.
ياسين، السيد. (1999). العولمة والطريق الثالث. مصر: الهيئة المصرية العامة للكتاب.
Adel, Hassan Al-Sayyid, The Nature of Money Laundering Operations and its Relationship to Drug Spread, NaifArabUniversity for Security Sciences, Riyadh, 1429 AH - 2008 AD.
El-Sayed, Yassin, Globalization and the Third Way, The Egyptian General Book Organization, 1999.
Mustafa, Suef, Drugs and Society, An Integrative View, The National Council for Culture, Arts and Letters, Kuwait, 1996, pp. 177-184.
The National Office for Drug Control and Drug Addiction, Drug Control and Addiction Activities, statistical tally for the first eight months of 2019.
United nations. United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 1988.
Barthold, T.A., Hochman, H.M. (1988). Addiction as Extreme‐Seeking, Economic Inquiry.26 (1),pp.89‐106.
BECKER, G.S., MURPHY, K.M. (1990). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of PoliticalEconomy, 96(4), pp.675-700.
Becker, G.S., Grossman, M., Murphy, K.M. (1994). An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction .The American Economic Review, 84, pp.396‐418.
Behan, D.F; Eriksen, M.P; and Lin, Y. (2005). Economic effects of environmental tobacco smoke. SOA. Society of actuaries. Retrieved from: http://www.soa.org/files/pdf/ETSReportFinalDraft(Final%203).pdf, (Consulted on: 11/02/2017).
Bienvault, Pierre. (31/01/2017).Combien coûte le tabagisme en France et dans le monde ?.La Croix. Retrievedfrom : https://www.la croix.com/Sciences/Sante/Combien-coute-tabagisme-France-dans-monde-2017-01-31. (Consultedon:04/04/2020).
CCDUS (26 Juin 2018). L’usage de substances au Canada coûte 38,4 milliards de dollars par année. Centre canadien sur les dépendances et l’usage de substances. Retrievedfrom : https://www.ccsa.ca/fr/lusage-de-substances-au-canada-coute-384-milliards-de-dollars-par-annee. (Consulted on: 09/04/2020).
CHEN, JAMES. (2019). Money Laundering. Jun 25, 2019. LAWS & REGULATIONS. Retrieved from:https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/moneylaundering.asp. (Consulted on: 09/07/2019).
CidambiIndra, M.D . (2017). Actual Cost of Drug Abuse in U.S. Tops $1 Trillion Annually. Psychologytoday,Retrieved from:https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sure-recovery/201708/actual-cost-drug-abuse-in-us-tops-1-trillion-annually. (Consulted on: 13/04/2020).
EMCDDA; Europol. (April 2016).EU Drug Markets Report: Strategic Overview. Lisbon:European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Abuse Addiction.
Farrell, M.J. (1952). Irreversible demand functions, Econometrica.20. pp.171-186. In Leonard, Green; John H. Kagel. 1996. Advances in behavior economics. Substance Use and Abuse. United States of America: Ablex Publishing Corporation. ISNB 1-56750-147-8. Retrieved from: https://books.google.dz/books?id=_xzHhq2dXh0C&pg=PA204&lpg=PA204&dq=8-%09Farrell,+M.J.+(1952).+Irreversible+demand+functions,+Econometrica.+20. (Consulted on: 01/07/2016).
Ferragut, Sergio.(2011). A Silent Nightmare: The bottom line and the challenge of illicit drugs [htlm]. Retrieved from:http://www.lulu.com/shop/sergio-ferragut/a-silent-nightmare-the-bottom-line-and-the-challenge-of¬illicit-drugs/paperback/product-1 651 3728.html. (Consulted on: 06/06/2019).
FRANK, B. (Nov, 1996). The use of internal games: The case of addiction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(5), pp.651-660.
Guindon, G.E et al. (2006). The cost attributable to tobaccouse: a critical review of the literature. Geneva: WorldHealth Organization.
Gorman, W.M. (1967). Tastes, habits, and choices, International Economic Review, June. 8(2).pp.218-222.
HPI. Substance Abuse: Facing the Costs. (n.d.). Washington DC :Georgetown University: Health Policy Institute.Retrieved from:https://hpi.georgetown.edu/abuse.(Consulted on: 12/04/2020).
INCB. (15 Novembre 2002). Les drogues illicites et le développement. Vienne :The International Narcotics Control Board. Nations Unies.
INCB. (2011). Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2010. New York: International Narcotics Control Board, United Nations publication. Sales No. E.11.XI.1, ISBN: 978-92-1-148258-4, ISSN: 0257-3717.
Kopp, Pierre. (Décembre 2015). Le coût Social des Drogues en France. France : OFDT. Observatoire Français des Drogues et des Toxicomanies.
Labrousse, Alain; Laniel, Laurent (2001) .The World Geopolitics of Drugs 1998/1999. Law & Social Change, 36, pp. 1-20.
Lemennicier, B. (1992). Prohibition de la drogue : diagnostic et solutions, Journal deséconomistes et des études humaines, Décembre. 3(4), pp.493‐522.
Pierrard, Bertrand. (1985). Fumer ou ne pas fumer ...Un modèle de l’initiation sur données empiriques. Paris :CREDES .
Merrefield, Clark .(2019). Inside the economics of illegal drugs, from cryptocurrencies to Major League Baseball, Journalistsresource. May 31, 2019. Retrieved from: https://journalistsresource.org/studies/economics/economics-illegal-drugs/. (Consulted on: 15/11/2019).
NDIC. (April 2011). The Economic Impact of Illicit Drug Use on American Society. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE . NATIONAL DRUG INTELLIGENCE CENTER .April 2001, Retrieved from : ix. http://www.justice.gov/ndic. (Consulted on: 14/04/2020).
Thaler, R., Shefrin, H.M. (1981). An economic theory of self control, Journal of PoliticalEconomy, 89(2). pp.392‐406. Retrieved from:http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JPE. (Consulted on: 07/10/2018).
RACHLIN, H. (1997). Four teleological theories of addiction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), pp.462-473.
LEE L.W. (1988). The predator-prey theory of addiction. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 17, pp.249-262.
Liu ,Y et al. (2006). Cigarette smoking and poverty in China. Social Science & Medicine, 63(11), pp.2784–2790.
Loewenstein, G. (1999). A Visceral Account of Addiction. in J. Elster and Ole J. Skog (eds.), Getting Hooked: Rationality and Addiction. England: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LOONIS, E. (1997). Notre cerveau est un drogué, vers une théorie générale des addictions. Toulouse : Presses Universitaires du Mirail.
ONUDC. (2016). Rapport Mondial sur les Drogues 2016 : Résumé Analytique. Vienne : Office des Nations Unies Contre la Drogue et le Crime, New York : Nations Unies.
Philippe, Lahens. (Avril 1990) ; Economie de la drogue.Rapport de recherche présenté en vue de l’obtention de la maîtrise en sciences (MSC) unpublishedthesis type, Université de Montréal, département des sciences économiques, faculté des arts et des sciences.
Schelling, T.C. (1978). Egonomics, or the art of self‐management, The American Economic Review,68(2). pp.290‐294. in American Economic Association.Retrievedfrom: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1816707.(Consultedon: 14/11/2018).
Single, Eric, et all. (1996), Les coûts de l’abus de substances au Canada : Une étude sur l’estimation des coûts. Ottawa :Centre canadien de lutte contre l’alcoolisme et les toxicomanies.
Suranovic, S.M., Goldfarb, R.S., Leonard, T.C. (1999). An economic theory of cigarette addiction, Journal of Health Economics, 18(1). pp.1‐29.
Stigler, G.J., Becker, G.S. (1977). De gustibus non estdisputandum, TheAmerican EconomicReview, March. 67(2). pp.76‐90. in American Economic Association. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1807222. (Consulted on: 19/10/2019).
Strotz, R.H. (1956). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization, The Review ofEconomic Studies, (01 December) 23(3). pp.165‐180. in American Economic Association. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2295722. (Consulted on: 13/11/2018).
Surendran, Sundarakani; Ramasamy,M. (2015). Evaluation of Money Laundering in Real Estate Sector. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 23 (3), pp.463-472.
Transparency International. (October 2010) Corruption Perceptions Index 2010. Berlin, Germany: Transparency International.
Tremblay, P.Y et collab. (14 Juillet 2011). Consommation de drogues au volant. Bulletin d’information toxicologique, 27(3).l’Institut national de santé publique du Québechttp://portails.inspq.qc.ca/toxicologieclinique/consommation-de-drogues-au-volant.aspx. (Consulted on: 12/03/2019).
WHO. (2004). World no tobacco day 2004 materials. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/tobacco/resources/publications/wntd/2004/en/index.html. (Consulted on: 01/04/2018).
Copyright (c) 2021 Mohamed belbrik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
![image host](<a%20href="https://imgbox.com/bQJEiPz8" target="_blank"><img src="https://thumbs2.imgbox.com/ad/fe/bQJEiPz8_t.png" alt="image host"/></a>)
