Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Publication of an article in a peer reviewed journal is an essential model for our journal "Dirassat Journal Economic Issue Review" In order to provide our readers with a journal of highest quality, we state the following principles of Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement. Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parts involved in the act of publishing: Editors, authors, and reviewers. Dirassat Journal Economic Issue Review is fully committed to good publication practice and assumes the task of fulfilling the following duties and responsibilities.
Duties of Editors
The editors ensure that all submitted manuscripts being considered for publication undergo peer-review by at least two reviewers who are expert in the field. The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for deciding which of the manuscripts submitted to the journal will be published, based on the validation of the work in question, its importance to researchers and readers, the reviewers’ comments, and such legal requirements as are currently in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The Editor-in-Chief may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Editors evaluate submitted manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit (importance, originality, study’s validity, clarity) and its relevance to the journal’s scope, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, religious belief, political philosophy or institutional affiliation. The Editor-in-Chief has full authority over the entire editorial content of the journal and the timing of publication of that content.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communications with authors, may assist authors in improving their manuscripts. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication and lies at the heart of scientific endeavour. DJEI shares the view of many that all scholars who wish to contribute to the scientific process have an obligation to do a fair share of reviewing.
Standards of Objectivity
Acknowledgement of Sources
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest