The impact of alignment (strategy / structure) on organizational effectiveness in the organization. A case study of a sample of Algerian institutions
Abstract
The objective of this study is to examine the impact of compatibility (strategy / structure) on organizational effectiveness in the organization. According to the empirical study, we found that there is a positive relationship between compatibility (strategy / structure) and organizational effectiveness and that the absence of such a consensus would lead to poor performance on the sample companies in our study
Downloads
References
Lasary, Tout sur le management, paris, 2006.
Chandler,Alfred.D., Stratgy and structure : Chapters in the history of the industrial Enterprise, Cambridge , mass: Mit press, 1962.
Nancy Da Silva& al, Organizational Strategy and Employee Outcomes: A Person–Organization Fit Perspective, The Journal of Psychology, 144(2) 2010.
J.F Soutenain & P. Farcet, Organisation et Gestion de L’entreprise, Edition Foucher, Paris, 2006, Berti Edition, Alger, 2007, p 105.
Hach, M., Organization Theory-Modern Symbolic and Post-moden Perspectives, Great Britain, 1997.
Danny Miller, Relating Porter's Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications, the Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 2 (Jun., 1988).
Hach, M., Organization Theory-Modern Symbolic and Post-moden Perspectives, Great Britain, 1997.
Daft, R, L., Organization Theory and Design, 7th edition, south – western college publishing of thomosn learning .U.S.A, 2001.
Kerbouche.M & Belmimoun.A & Bouhelal.F & Kerroucha.I, The Impact of Organizational Characteristics in Effectiveness: (Algerian’s Empirical Study of Small and Medium Enterprises), Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Vol 6 No 2, March 2015.
Burns, T. & Stalker, G., The Management of Innovation, London, tavistock Pupliction, 1961, p 125.
Scott W. Geiger & William J. Ritchie, Dan Marlin, Strategy/Structure Fit and Firm Performance, Organization Development Journal, 24, 2; ABIIINFORM Global , Summer 2006, p 12.
Costa Eleni, S., The colleges of human resource management towards organizational Effectiveness A comparative Study in South ern Eu , Journal of European industrial Training ,Vol.29, no.2 Emerald Group publishing Limited. 2005, p.113.
- Daft, R., Organization Theory and Design, 11th edition., USA., 2013, p23.
Robin Hill, What Sample Size is “Enough” in Internet Survey Research?, Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, Volume 6, Number 3-4, July 1998, p4.
Collection statistiques, le premier recensement économique, office national des statistiques Alger 2012, p.68.
James Dean Brown, Likert items and scales of measurement?, SHIKEN: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter.. 15(1) 10-14, March 2011.
- Dane Bertram, Likert Scales, poincare.matf.bg.ac.rs/~kristina/topic-dane-likert : 02/03/2015.
- John M. Linacre, Investigating Rating Scale Category Utility, Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(2), 103-122, 1999, p105.
Robert F.DeVellis, Scale Development : Theory and Applications, SAGE Publications, Third Edition, London, 2012, p31.
Eun Jin Hwang, Strategic Management and Financial Performance in South Korean Apparel Retail Stores, Thesis Doctoral in Philosophy In Apparel, Housing, and Resource Management, Virginia Polytechnic University, November 16, Blacksburg, VA, 2005, pp127-135.
Charles E. Lance & Marcus M. Butts & Lawrence C. Michels, The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria: What Did They Really Say?, Organizational Research Methods, Volume 9 Number 2 April 2006, p205.
Rothbard, N. P., & Edwards, J. R. Investment in work and family roles: A test of identity and utilitarian motives. Personnel Psychology,56 , 2003, p713.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
![image host](<a%20href="https://imgbox.com/bQJEiPz8" target="_blank"><img src="https://thumbs2.imgbox.com/ad/fe/bQJEiPz8_t.png" alt="image host"/></a>)
